Lefora Free Forum
4520 views

Sadhguru and the Isha Foundation

Page 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7
< older posts 21–40 of 124 newer >
novice - member
17 posts

The "ENLIGHTENED MASTER" is emotionally shaken by the number of people following him. He would not give up his luxury at all. Now, he slowly moved the focus towards social service, growing trees, running schools etc. If anybody questions his authenticity re wisdom... he has the "Social Service" shield now. No enlightened person will ever claim that he is enlightened. But everybody should accept JV is a clever business man. Check out his site now... there is a link for Isha Business Private Ltd.



With all due respect to you, all I can say is go and sit in the basic ISHA yoga course and then decide for yourself. Yes, it was Sadhguru who emphasized that the tag business be added to the venture because it was "business". Please don't judge him without experiencing his presence. All I can say is go and try his course and then comment based on your experience.


Whenever Isha is criticized, the first statement that comes from people obsessed with “ISHA” is go and attend ... go and take up the Yoga course. Pathanjali’s (Father of Yoga) yoga techniques are taught at Isha. Yoga, as such, if practiced will have an effect on body/mind, i.e., it prepares you for self realization. After that realization, you will care a damn about the material things. JV does not seem to be an “Andharmukhi” and he is very much influenced by “Rajo” guna.


Also, the first thing (as far as I know) taught at Isha is promise on JV’s photograph that the secrecy will be maintained and all other spiritual things learned so far (may be, according to ISHA, spiritual garbage) must be erased from the mind. Why should that be? As if all the lineages of spiritual gurus who led a very modest, simple, honest life mean nothing?? And here is JV – your saviour? Is this the organization’s attitude? Is it a cult?


And I have listened to many of his discourses on youtube. Many of those are in similar lines of Osho’s and ridicule beliefs of others. And I have learnt from one of the participant of the program at that there is a separate cottage given to people who can afford and others stay at dormitory kind of setup. Why is such a difference shown at Isha?


I know a few places that teach yoga and self-realization courses where no matter a person can afford or not everyone is treated equally. JV is a social worker, a very clever business person and enjoys all the comforts of life under the cover of Yoga. Going by his teaching, he knows what he wants from life and he knows his full potential. It’s as simple as that!


Hi,
Once again I don't want to argue with you. But as far as I could understand, the only way you can comprehend anything in spiritual world is thro' your own experience. So, don't try to judge someone like sadhguru from what you perceive from here. Go and sit in his presence and then write about him.


I don't remember making any promise on sadhguru's photograph. Of course, they do say that we shouldn't teach this to others not because it is secret but because teaching yoga requires a lot of dedication, skill and more importantly a certain level of self realisation. A teacher in ISHA undergoes a rigorous 3-5 years training! OK, I leave it to you on your judgement of sadhguru.. I don't have anything to say on that..


As far as spiritual garbage is concerned, they emphasize more on experience than on knowledge. I have also found that sometimes knowledge (usually wrong understanding) about spiritual matters hinders our growth.


Yes, sadhguru is a realized master. So, he knows his full potential. Once again, I don't have anything to say on your judgement of sadhguru. All i can say is "Don't judge an enlightened being thro' your logical mind. They are beyond that". Do you know that he travels around the world without a single paisa in his hand?



Whoever is associated with Isha go very anxious whenever someone criticizes Isha and you seem to be bit different. As such, once you are in public life you cannot escape criticism.


Re promise on JV’s photograph … I came to know about this from 2 persons who attended the program. Do you mean to say whoever teaches Yoga there are self realized souls (certain level)? What’s that level? Realization is either zero or 100%. Thanks for leaving it to the people who have judged him perfectly.


My question is what does ISHA say? All those lineages of realized gurus who have been insisting on practicing dharma, propagating worship of god and leading a pious life are fools? How can you say it’s wrong understanding? It’s just a biased statement because your mind is so obsessed with Isha. I think JV also said once going to temples and worshipping is a kind of hallucination. What an arrogant way of ridiculing faith of millions of people. Re knowledge and experience… even JV insists on experience and sometimes on knowledge…depending on the persons who he speaks to, i.e. depending on his mood. I have noticed that in few of his interviews, his answers are intended to satisfy the interviewer. 


Sadhguru is not a realized master. He is a social worker. You talking about logical mind…this is really strange… all JV talks are premised on scientific and logical thinking…you say don’t use your logical mind??? He travels without a single paisa? What’s great about it? He has his business centers all over the world and he has his ardent followers to support him. I don’t think it’s something great to appreciate. Simplicity is beyond JV’s reach. ISHA is a cult. 

 


OK, if that is so why don't you go and sit in his presence. Why don't you blog us your true experience after that?


Sadhguru has always said that temples are "energy centers". It is not a place where you go to get life solutions. GOD is not someone who will solve your problems. One must realize that life is in their hands. This is what he has always emphasized. Also, he has said that most of the problems in this world is between one man's belief vs another man's belief. Hence, according to him faith in something (without experience) is always dangerous.


See, basically there are 4 different ways to attain the ultimate or you can become enlightened using the 4 tools available to you - body (karma yoga), mind (gyan yoga), emotion (bakthi) and energy (kriya yoga). In ISHA sadhguru (or any true guru for that matter, according to sadhguru) gives the right concoction of these 4 to the seeker. Every individual is unique and so is his spiritual path. Hence, in ISHA the right method is given to the right person.


Sadhguru always says "If a guru is not enlightened then it is his problem and you (or me) not being enlightened is (y)our problem". My statement on "logical mind" was actually given by another master "nithyananda" and is not from ISHA.
OK, sadhguru was not very keen on starting an organization. Only because the volunteers insisted, he agreed to start it. It was also started to reach to as many people as possible.


I am a bit surprised about your remark on ISHA people. But, as far as I have seen, most of them are really open like you and me. Some of them who really feel strongly connected with sadhguru might be stronger in voicing their opinions. This is just my guess.


Yes patanjali gave the "Yoga sutras". The word Sutra means "thread". It is left to the master to make a garland out of it (or as sadhguru says to blow life in to it). Hence, even though patanjali's yoga sutra might work (sometimes even go awry) for anyone and everyone if practiced on own, it might not be as effective as it is in ISHA (or in other good programs like AOL). In short, in ISHA the yoga sutras are taught in "right spirits and in the right way".


Even in past, there were enlightened beings (many nayanmars or sivan adiyars) who did very simple things leading a simple life. At the same time, there were kings like janaka who were fully enlightened. Hence, enlightenment is not about what you do but all about "how" you do it? Nithyananda beautifully says " You can be an enlightened engineer, doctor, lawyer etc; leading both a social and spiritual life".



Sage Suka was teaching a number of disciples including the wise emperor, Janaka. One day, Suka started his discourse late, for, Janaka had not yet come. The others resented the extra attachment that Suka bestowed on Janaka. They ascribed it to the fact that he was the emperor of the realm; they felt that their Guru was unfortunately moved by those mundane considerations. Suka knew how their imagination was weaving falsehoods and prejudices. So, he decided to cast off this envy from their hearts.


After Janaka came and the discourse lasted for sometime, Suka so managed with his mystic powers that they could see in the far distance, near the horizon, the city of Mithila, the capital of the emperor, caught in flames and crumbling in the conflagration. The disciples were listening to Atma Bodha, the lesson that the Atma alone is real and that all else is appearance, imposed on the Atma, by the fog of illusion and ignorance. Every other disciple ran off, leaving the class and the preceptor, each on his own self, afraid that the oncoming fire will burn his clothes or books.


But Janaka, whose capital city was being reduced to ashes sat unmoved for he knew that what was being consumed by fire was only appearance and not reality. Suka himself asked Janaka to go and assess the damage and try to save what can be saved from the fire. But Janaka replied that his treasure was the Jnana (wisdom) he was getting from his master and that he was unconcerned about the objective world, approachable by external instruments of knowledge. At this Suka revealed that the fire was a make-believe, created by him to show others the depth of real scholarship earned by Janaka in contrast to their superficial learning. Do you compare a business man like JV with Janaka? It is just unreasonable.


“If a Guru is not enlightened it is his problem” is just an irresponsible statement. It is like a teacher telling a student “Why do you bother about my knowledge?” you have to earn yours. True seeker will be attracted towards gurus and believes that he is the embodiment of God himself and such a statement sounds bizarre (or just to sound different from others). I have listened to lot of Nithyananda’s discourses. In one discourse he says YOU WILL NOT GET BLISS, YOU WILL ONLY GET BLISTERS.


Is it the way a realized master treat people who are serious about spirituality? In another discourse he comments on people doing pranayama at his ashram – he says every morning all of you breath in and out with “buss buss” sound like air flowing in and out of a pump, at many instances he boasts himself and he keeps boasting himself. Now, you would conclude that I keep bashing everybody. Actually, I am disappointed with personalities like him who are very much excited with the money and fame they receive and they keep talking and they talk and they talk…


Enlightenment changes the whole perception about the way you lead your life. There will be no self interest at all. Your view becomes as big as this world. And you will lose interest in the outside world and abide as the self. This is the result. And of course, you would continue as a doctor, lawyer etc. without bothering about the result. You become a karma yogi.


Why is ISHA being promoted as the only right path? There were many yoga masters like BKS iyengar, Sri Krishnamacharya who have not attached any tag to their teachings like ISHA. They are widely known and respected by millions. There is nothing like ISHA yoga. If ISHA or AOL is the only place to learn “GENUINE” yoga (I don’t think AOL claims so), what about Krishnamacharya, BKS and other countless yoga teachers? How can you claim they are not as effective as ISHA? ISHA (which is a cult) is not the only place to learn Yoga. There are many other good places that do not do it as business.


You say that ISHA was started due to request from volunteers. In one of his interviews with Sudhangan, JV said I didn’t have any intention to start an organization, lot of people were coming in. That’s why I had to start. Now, you say volunteers insisted upon it! It is just an excuse to defend people who accuse JV is doing a business. If it was started to reach as many people, it is marketing! 


Why is it being insisted again and again Isha gives the right method? Every individual is unique and so is his path. Leave those people who are emotionally attached towards god (bhakti). I have listened to one of JV’s talks where he sarcastically makes some remarks on puranas. What is the need of it? Why he keeps ridiculing the beliefs of others? In one of his interviews with Koffee with Anu, he made some comment on “Adam and Eve”. Going by his words, he is the one who is creating a clash between faiths. This comment was unwarranted and made with publicity intention.


According to him, except ISHA, where people are asked to believe and surrender willingly, all other belief systems are meaningless and followed by senseless people which will take you to nowhere. It is stated in the sastras that for self realization a man has to follow one of these 4 yogas…or a concoction of a few or all of these 4. Do you mean to say ISHA assesses every individual, studies his mental framework and suggests a path? 


I don’t accept JV’s view that most of the problems in this world are between one man’s belief vs another man’s. It is just between fanatics who do not accept/honor others’ beliefs. If faith without experience is always DANGEROUS, experience without faith is IMPOSSIBLE. are of course energy centers. Even swami vivekananda has told that life is in your hands and that does not refrain people from going to temples for their worldly problems. If a devotee has faith in himself and god, if his prayers are sincere, it will be addressed by the deity at the temple for sure.


I have learnt yoga from a very simple man and practicing it. I did not pay any money for it. The best part is he never asked me to go and recommend it to my friends/relatives. I don’t have any interest in sitting in front of the social worker/business man JV. However, I would visit the place at least once when I get an opportunity. ISHA is just a feel good cult. 

novice - member
18 posts

Hi,
Yes, viji (his wife) died (attained mahasamadhi) and sadhguru was charged for it. But, later it was proved that it was a natural death. So, I believe it would be irresponsible and unethical to talk about something which is far from truth. I am not crticizing you but just making my point clear.

novice - member
18 posts

Yes, I do know about the story on janaka (thanks to nithyananda). According to me, Sadhguru is no less than the buddha. Nithyananda himself has said in one of the discourses that even if the guru is not genuine and if you devotion to him is genuine, you'll attain enlightenment (he cites Kalidas's story as an example). See, from my understanding sadhguru or any guru does many work (including discourses) to break your ego. Hence, even though they might contradict, it is something done to stop your mind from interfering in the spiritual process.

See, what BKS or any other yoga programs teach will definitely have an effect on the body and mind. Going beyond (as far as I know) is not possible. If that was possible, then they should have become enlightened first. In AOL or ISHA, yoga is not seen as science to have a healthy body and mind. It is something for higher purposes. Trying to use yoga to get a sound body and mind (and stopping right there) is like using an aeroplane just as a car! In ISHA, you use an aeroplane to fly!

Yes, it was both because of volunteers and the wish to reach as many as possible. Sadhguru was conducting yoga programs under different names (organization names) for legality. In order to make it more practical, they decided to register a organization (foundation) under the name "ISHA".

See, the buss buss sound comment by sadhguru was to emphasize on the importance of pouring consciousness when doing your pranayam or kriya. If you do it without the consciousness, then it will just become another ritual.

Sadhguru has never said that ISHA is the only way. He has always said that try ISHA yoga and continue only if it works for you. He has never said (as far as I know) ISHA way is the only way. There are many followers because it works!

Yes, they give you the right concoction if you become a bramachari or sanyasi in the ashram. For the common people the basic course (hatha and kriya yoga) is taught the same way. Also, they have started holding regular sathsangs for interested people. I believe giving the right concoction is not feasible unless you become a sanyasi in the ashram. 

Yes, deity responding to devotees (from what I have read recently) is possible. Typical example is KALI. KALI seems to be a kind of energy which could be used for both positive and negative ways. Every master has his own ways of empahsizing things. For eg, Ramanuja was totally against the advaita by shankara. I believe (!) every master is in this world for a specific purpose and so follow them only if his/her method suits you. 

Regarding the comment on Adam and Eve by sadhguru in coffee with anu, I was also surprised to hear to that comment. Whenever he says something it is usually with utter clarity and responsbility. I don't have anything to say on christianity. But, the kind of conversions that they are doing is totally unacceptable. One of the reasons, why I believe it to be unacceptable, is because they are exploiting social conditions to do so. 

See, experience without faith is possible. Try ISHA yoga (or any yoga taught by a proper guru) and you'll start experiencing things slowly. I am telling this from my own experience. The beauty of yoga is that you needn't have faith in the method. It is a science. No matter you do the experiment here or some where else in the world, it works (provided you do it properly) !

OK, you have come to a conclusion that Sadhguru is not for you. I don't want to convince you or do any such nonsense. All I can say is, if you can't feel connected with a guru after trying his method, then try changing it. It is up to you to give it a sporting chance!

See, even in ISHA they don't force you to recommend people to join ISHA. I will tell from my own experience. I have benefited a lot (and will continue to benefit a lot) from this wonderful ISHA yoga program. Out of my own gratitude and sheer love to see many of my fellow beings to get benefited, I have always recommended it to people whenever possible.

OK, let me say something on the money they collect for basic ISHA programs. It is around Rs. 1000 (now) for 7 days course. The program is for 3.5 hours daily + sunday (full day ~ 9 am to 4 pm) conducted in three batches. They conduct this program in a marriage hall as they don't have a permananent center except in coimbatore. I am sure you know as how much it would cost for a marriage hall for seven days. Approximately 75-100 people (3 batches put together) would attend this program. Most (or all) of the money goes to the rent and the rest to the foundation. The teacher works for free as he is a full time volunteer. The stay and food for the teacher will be arranged in the homes of another volunteer. As far as I know, they don't collect any money for people in villages. I leave it to you to decide if it is worth spending this money. All I can say from my experience is, this Rs 1000 is nothing to the benefits that you would derive. 

novice - member
18 posts

Yes, deity responding to devotees (from what I have read recently) is possible. Typical example is KALI. KALI seems to be a kind of energy which could be used for both positive and negative ways. Every master has his own ways of empahsizing things. For eg, Ramanuja was totally against the advaita by shankara. I believe (!) every master is in this world for a specific purpose and so follow them only if his/her method suits you.

Some more comments on this. For this to work you need to be emotionally attached to the deity. Once again, this is for someone in the bhakthi path. But for this to happen, the deity should have been consecrated properly. I don't know as how many modern temples have been truly consecrated by knowledgebale gurus as most of them were built by the devotees out of sheer love for the GOD. ISHA is also coming up with something of this sort - called the linga bairavi soon.

rookie - member
1 posts


hi there,
I just got back from the BSP program, and was going to stay for a Sathsung on the next day.  As soon as they gave me my cell phone back, I called my husband  and had him change my flight to a day earlier.  I wanted to run like hell.  The whole thing scared me straight. 
I loved IE, but BSP was way too bizarre for all the reasons you mentioned.  I, like another girl that responded to you. have not felt myself since coming home.  It's totally bumming me out, since I had to do so much work to get out of my depression and anxiety.
I absolutely hated the whole thing and would never attend another class.  I feel almost superstitious..........like I'm feeling this way because I came home and told my husband of some of the bizarre things that went on.  As you know, it's supposed to be classified information---LOL.  I need to get rid of that and move on.  I was perfectly fine before I went there.  I'm freaking myself out now!
Wesslea

rookie - member
1 posts

Please send your experience at isha to me. my mail id is burbanksarah at gmail dot com. Thanks

novice - member
17 posts

Millions of Indians know about Janaka before you learnt about the saint-king from Nithyananda. It is your liberty to take JV as Buddha and please understand there are millions who just consider him as a Yoga businessman/social worker. Re dumb guru … you mean to say you don’t bother about gurus … just go and fall at their feet. It’s just irrational / insensible / illogical. I could very well understand how much you are obsessed with JV/Isha and trying your best to defend whatever they do, even if there is contradiction. Fyi … JV keeps insisting on science and logic but at a later stage of the program you are asked not to question anything just accept it. What a logic?   
You say that BKS/other yoga programs cannot take you far only ISHA can take you in a flight (this is business, this is marketing, this is brand promotion). Why don’t you just leave people have their beliefs and follow their own path. As you and JV claim ISHA is not the only way (or not the way at all). BKS and others did not want to do business that’s why they didn’t claim they are enlightened. Also, they are very much aware that no enlightened person will ever claim that “I am Enlightened”. The way JV behaves and talks does not show any sign of enlightenment. Once I have heard him say that this is my body. How can you ever stamp a person as enlightened whose thoughts have not gone beyond his body? Have you ever been into the bungalow ‘The Enlightened Person’ has built for himself at ISHA, .
 
Re… starting the organization. Yes, that’s the way you have to do a business. Re new temple… that’s innovation. You have to keep innovating and bring in new things to bring in more people. Without innovation survival in the business will become difficult.
 
Fyi… the buss buss sound comment is from Nithyananda (you call himself also sadguru?)… he is called paramahamsa. Isn’t it? Let that be… is it the way you insult the people who have come close to you with such immense faith? There is another thread on Swami Nithyananda. http://guruphiliac.lefora.com/2008/11/17/nithyananda-rapes-holy-mountain/page1/ (ISHA's BSP vs Nithyananda's NSP)
 
JV and people who do marketing for ISHA do believe that ISHA is the only way and the people who go there are brainwashed to look down upon other faiths. Just go through all the comments you posted … you don’t approve BKS and other yoga teachers, you don’t approve temples built by others fyi… there are countless jeeva samadhis of gnanis and REAL sadgurus across India and people visit those places even today and find solutions to their materialistic and spiritual problems as well. If it doesn’t work for you… pay the money and leave. Could you please reply to Wesslea?
 
As far as I know, it is up to sadahaka to decide upon the path (or a concoction of techniques) to follow. Guru just guides him. Without faith there is no experience. It’s just a common sense. JV says vice versa. It’s something like saying you can eat your food without opening the mouth here. All these are attempts to bring in people and give them a new/fresh sensation. You go to a calm holiday resort and do breathing exercises properly. You will feel the same. 
 
 You are referring to Ramakrsiha Paramahamsa. Not only Kali, there are lots of temples built by devotees, rishis, and kings that are properly consecrated as per Agama Vithi. Those are not properly built, because JV says so!!! Millions of people visit those places even today. Of course, there are temples that are built just for money (like JV’s Isha). So, please stop saying all those people who built/worship the deities there are mediocre and only JV’s place is great. It sounds so silly and awkward. So what? There are still followers of Ramanauja and Adhi shankara… it’s just different school of thoughts. What is there in it? Many people know this fact.
The comment on Adam/Eve is irresponsible and was made to get more media attention.
 
Swami Vivekananda has told “If you don’t have faith in yourself and you run behind hundreds of gurus and gods there is no point. It’s just meaningless.” So, even if you don’t have faith… no problem… come and pay us money we will give you spiritual experience. The ISHA business way!   
 
No sorry. I don’t want to come to a Yoga business man. I don’t even want to give it a chance in my life. If I am going to lose something because of this, I would like to be a proud loser.
 
Re your opinion about ISHA and benefits… you have all the rights to recommend it to people. Nobody can stop you. But understand there are lots of people whose opinions are otherwise.
 
I know many instances when ISHA programs were conducted at Schools/colleges in Chennnai. May be in they conduct it at marriage halls. Could you please shed light on Isha Vidhya and . Which one takes fees in lakhs and which one is for rural children?

Who is JV to say that the deities at many temples are not consecrated properly. He should be about 60-65 years old. He got enlightenment (as he claims) when he was sitting at Velliangiri forest (may be while catching cobras). And he questions the credibility of those places. JV, as a businessman, has no quality to do it. Because, he just cannot accept/respect faith/beliefs of others. If his opinion about other places is this, then please accept the views about ISHA from others. Now, you know who is creating clash between faiths!

novice - member
46 posts

1) People have been trying to convert others to their religions and beliefs since the beginning of time. Isha is no different.
 
At least christians tell you they are speaking on behalf of Jesus when they are trying to convert you.  But SJV tells you its scientific and experiential and poo-poos temple worship.  How scientific can isha be if there is deity worship everywhere?  Dhyana linga and temple, deity mantras, shiva mantras and songs, guru pooja, statues of pantanjali and snakes, etc
 
2) An earlier post said in regards to the 4 types of yoga:  In ISHA sadhguru (or any true guru for that matter, according to sadhguru) gives the right concoction of these 4 to the seeker. Every individual is unique and so is his spiritual path. Hence, in ISHA the right method is given to the right person.
 
This is not true. The same method is given to every person taking Isha....clever marketing with the ol' bait and switch.  At least Maharishi gave out different mantras to his TM devotees that were secret and exclusive to the seeker. Well....not true...another bait and switch. Turns out, the mantra was assigned based on age, year and gender, no secret to the mantra. The mantras are all deity names (Shreem, Hrim, Aim, etc).
 
3) SJV does not say isha is the only way. But he does say, it is the best way, the quickest way, the most dependable and scientific way, etc. Again, all the other gurus say the same thing. Show me someone in Isha that has become enlightened? In no way is Isha any different than all the other body/mind yoga programs out there.
 
4) Isha followers keep saying "do not use your logical mind", and "sit in his presence" and "experience before you judge"  These are all things that SJV says over and over again and the good devotees repeat these words to convert more people. Its working, isn't it?  But it's been used before. These are the same tactics used to persuade others to join millions of others cults, yoga groups, mass gatherings and the like. And its a perfect argument since they can claim they have experienced...therefore they know. You haven't experienced (you silly person) therefore they know more than you and therefore they must be right. Sounds like they are using their logical minds to convert you.
 
BTW, I have 'sat in hs presence' and had all sorts of 'experiences' in his programs. But I use my logical mind to realize the level of self-delusion that occurs. And I use my logical mind to see he contradicts himself, is arrogant, eyeballs the young ladies, mingles with shady politicians, and thoroughly enjoys his worship and admiration from his devoted followers. He tells tall tales about himself that no one can prove or disprove but many are eager to believe. How is this belief any different than followers of other self-appointed masters? You'll notice that SJV followers take offense at any questions geared towards isha or SJV and they have every excuse to cover up any plausible arguments one may make. This is the definition of brainwashed.
 
Do not throw away your logical mind! It is the only thing we have to discern truth or what is right or wrong. Personal experiences are subjective and self-serving.



novice - member
46 posts

Two more things:
 
Anyone can find Isha tax returns online.....Millions of dollars being made.
 
Anyone can find (limited) info about Viji's death online....No cause of death is available as the body was burned the next day, making an autopsy impossible.


novice - member
20 posts

happyd said: 
 'Anyone with any knowledge of cults, group behavior, hypnosis, meditation, persuasion, etc? '

I wrote a long response to this request yesterday then deleted it. It was the word 'expert' that bothered me. I am an expert only in my own perspective. I have no knowledge of Isha but it seems to be a modern, more subtle version of the same old power scam.

Briefly, I was born into a cultic family with all the abuse, secrets, confusion, manipulation etc that we know from the sensational headlines about larger cults.

I quit the family asap and have spent the ensuing years trying to unravel the confusion. I am quite well versed in manipulative techniques, influence, persuasion and group/organisational behaviour having studied this stuff in an attempt to avoid being continually snared by it. My formative education in my family makes me a sucker for this stuff.
Having said that, these behaviours and dynamics are present to a greater or lesser degree in all human interactions-we all manipulate to get our way.

A 30+ year meditator, I am comfortable with meditation being a form of hypnosis, I am just very picky about what I allow to influence me when in a very receptive state--this was not always the case.

I'm not sure what you want or expect from your 'expert'. A study of these subjects doesn't really require an expert, just an open mind and a willingness to put in the effort.
What I have found most helpful is to sort out my own confusions to the extent that I am able before getting involved in someone else's confusions. This means being ruthlessly specific about what I want from a given situation before venturing in.
Personally, I would avoid Isha and his ilk until I was confident in what meaning, if any, 'spiritual' and 'objective reality' had for me.

novice - member
46 posts

Ellen,
Thanks for the response.

Sounds like you have a lot of experience in such things, and probably a few interesting stories to share as well!

What I'm looking for...its hard to nail down. For about 20 years, I've been 'searching' and keeping an open mind regarding all things non-physical. I've read, practiced and dabbled extensively through the years exploring many different systems, beliefs, rituals, ideas etc. I've never been in anything that most would call a cult. But, like most people, my definition of a cult is more of an extreme group that has a destructive quality. But, then my definition of a cult is changing after spending 3 years in Isha. 

So, reflecting back on my years of experiences, I seem to find some common threads though all the different groups, beliefs and ideologies. These common threads are numerous...such as group belonging, self-delusion, persuasion and even hypnosis. And the most glaringly obvious thing.... after awhile, the same open mind that got these people to explore the 'other-worldly' concepts or practices just disappears when they find something that 'feels right' for them. They dispose of that same open mind and call everyone else who hasn't found 'the way', close-minded or an outsider. I don't care what kind of experiences people think they have, they are no different than experiences people think they have in another group or religion.

(BTW, Sadhguru mocks meditation visions....such as angels or Jesus...as self-delusional. Yet he says images of Shiva during meditation are real)

So, basically, either everyone is right...or no one is right. Unless someone has proven their way is true, its all subjective beliefs.

Now, what I'm looking for at this point, is a group effort to expose these false ideologies. Some way of putting the 'experiences', hypnosis, persuasion techniques, delusions, etc, on the table so they can be looked at objectively. Maybe by joining the islands of ideologies, some sense can be made on why humans have this need and desire to 'find something' and be right in the process. When the similarities between different group-thinks can be seen, the specialness goes away. And we're left with some concrete objective proof of our needs as humans and how easily we can be duped into another's way of thinking or believing.  So, the next person searching for meaning in life, can keep their open mind through the entire process and not be yet another recruiter with fluffy testimonials.

I've been researching the stories of those who are former group followers or devotees. Yet I think most people don't share these stories just out of shear embarassment that they were duped. Or maybe some feel its better to ignore their past and move on. But if these experiences were shared, studied, and understood, we might be closer to crack our nature than all the AUM meditations we can muster. I don't know :)

novice - member
18 posts



First para
>This is your experience and I am no one to comment on this
I absolutely hated the whole thing and would never attend another class.  I feel almost superstitious..........like I'm feeling this way because I came home and told my husband of some of the bizarre things that went on.  As you know, it's supposed to be classified information---LOL.  I need to get rid of that and move on.  I was perfectly fine before I went there.  I'm freaking myself out now!Wesslea 

2nd and 3rd para
>All I can sense is that you have built a strong wall of self around you.. Hence, your ego is probably too afraid of breaking the wall.. This is what I can guess.. However, I haven't done BSP... I'll come back to you once I do it..  I am really longing to do it... Please don't mistake me.. I am commenting on this because happyd wanted me to comment to your post..

novice - member
18 posts




I think you are not reading my post carefully... I never said anything about temples built on jeeva samadhis... I just said most of the temples after 15-16th century were built by bakthas and they don't have the same quality as the yogic temples or temples installed by enlightened masters. Sadhguru himself has said there are many powerful places in India. 

Note:
(No offense intended) From what I can perceive (I might be wrong), you are trying to interpret things  about sadhguru and ISHA without fully knowing about it. 

Bus Bus comment was also told to us when we did the inner engineering. It was purely to emphasize on the importance of consciouness and nothing more. 

I don't know if Prana Prathishtai could be done by all the priests.. I believe it requires one to know the yogic science in depth.. 

Your comments on sadhguru referring to the body - I am not aware. He always says body is just a heap of food. You acquire your body from the earth and you give it back to it at the end. So, what you acquire can be yours but can't be you!

ISHA home school is a residential school started in velliangiri based on sadhguru's vision. It is a school which aims at bringing up a child in such a manner that the child blossoms so that spiritual process becomes a natural thing for him/her. Probably this might be costly (I don't know for sure). However, ISHA vidya is an attempt to provide education to students in rural areas all over TN... Even here they would do almost all that is done at ISHA home school.. ISHA home school is kind of a prototype for ISHA vidya.. ISHA vidya (as far as I know) is free..

All I can say is certain things might appeal to be right/wrong at some point of time. You can know for sure only if you experience it. This applies to me as well. My view point on BKS and others might be wrong. Right now, it just appears to be right to me. Likewise, you have formed an opinion on ISHA. Only possibility to know this is when you or I become enlightened!


novice - member
17 posts

Hi

To my understanding, a person has to know his existence for which the mind should turn inside... that's all is needed for enlightenment. In the process, all the silly doubts of the egoistic mind will be dispelled.

 All the practices (devotion or yoga) are meant for that.

The enlightenment is the only way to know the truth.If you realize yourself that's the best social service you can render to the world. True quest for knowledge and sincere yearning for god are the key to enlightenment.

If you believe ISHA is the way for you, I pray: "May the supreme soul embrace you"


novice - member
46 posts

Why is doubt considered egoistic or silly?  Didn't that doubt get you to look beyond what you were taught (social, parents, teachers, etc) in the first place?  You call it doubt, I call it 'open-mind'. Can I not quest for knowledge using all my faculties?

How many people have truly "realized" themselves? Seriously.

Certainly not those in Isha or they wouldn't be running around trying to convince other people they have found THE WAY, recruiting people just like any other fanatical group. After 3 years in Isha, I have not heard or met one 'self-realized' meditator there. Unless you count Sadhguru who self-proclaims his master-hood.


novice - member
46 posts

Vaidy, (I think this is your name - I can't read the left side of screen)

Wesslea did experience BSP and shared her not-so-blissful feelings about it.

Vaidy - you did not go to BSP. Then you say you can't comment on Wesslea's experiences. But then you DID comment on it - judging her as having an ego and a wall around her. So...if she had positive things to say, would you commend her and use her example to prove that isha is the way?


So, here seems to be the ISHA formula reduced to simplified algebra...I like math ;)

If X = Those who have not tried Isha,
And Y = Those who have tried Isha and BUY it,
And Z = Those who have tried Isha and DON'T BUY it,
And Q = (Y+Z)*#yrs practiced = Those who tried Isha, bought it, practiced it for years, became dis-illusioned and dispensed of it....

According to those in the Y group
Y > X       ( isha-ites are better than X and must find and SAVE them)
Y > Z       ( isha-ites are better and more enlightened than Z)
Y > Q       ( isha-ites that stay the course and not question isha are more advanced than ex-isha-ites)


Therefore:
Y = Know it all - pseudo-enlightened
X = Ignorant
Z = Ego with wall around them
Q = X*Z (Ego times ignorance)

Y will always win the argument, will win the most toys and achieve the highest bliss. Everyone else is X, Y or Q

 


novice - member
20 posts

happyd,
I like your algebra, it puts the whole endeavour in a nutshell, or in an equation.

You might try looking at group dynamics. Its interesting that every group, as it begins to consolidate and regardless of its original intention, can only define itself by comparing itself with what is not the group--insiders against outsiders. Each group develops a consensus reality, the members agree or accept what that reality is to be. If a member questions that consensus reality in any effective way that person is subtly or overtly marginalised, maybe punished and usually edged out. So if you want to be in a group you have to accept the group-think. For me there is no objective reality, just many consensus realities large and small. When people talk about objective reality they are generally referring to a widely accepted consensus reality.
 
When you start looking at why we operate this way you might see that we all do the same thing in our minds. The patterns and dynamics that are obvious in the outer world are expressions of what is going on in my head, your head and everyone elses head. Its just the way it is, the human condition, and there really isn't a way out. We play all manner of games with ourselves and others to avoid seeing this. (My saying that won't stop a single person looking- I knew that years ago and it didn't stop me.) The games can be fun if you don't take them too seriously.

I have quit seeking anything. I found that the seeking is the problem because it presupposes that there is something to be found. 
An enormous amount of anxiety disappeared when I quit looking for that indefinable something--we all have it anyway and cannot lose it -ever- so why look for it?
This is my subjective view and it doesn't preclude me from thinking or learning or keeping an open mind, it just means that for me the search is over and I can concentrate on being an ordinary person among other ordinary people. 

I wouldn't presume to advise anyone else on such a personal and subjective undertaking but I would say that it is very important to find some compassion for yourself just as you are.


novice - member
20 posts

happyd,
Wasn't being intentionally mysterious when I wrote '--we all have it anyway and cannot lose it -ever- so why look for it?'
The 'problem' from my POV is the view that we take of ourselves as somehow elevated from the natural world due to the development of our thinking capacities. The seeking is an expression of loss, loss of god or nature or awareness depending on your belief system. All creation myths allude to this view that we traded immersion in nature for our bigger brains. But we are kidding ourselves, we are indivisibly part of the natural world and cannot ever be otherwise no matter how exalted our thinking seems to be.

novice - member
17 posts

Happyd... your algebra equation is wonderful!

My understanding is, for enlightenment you got to erase your ego and leave the "I" behind. The door to TRUTH is within yourself and to know this the mind should turn inwards; for this the EGO should disappear. Following self inquiry (Who am I?), as taught by Ramana Maharishi, is the ideal way, in my view. Forget about GOD for a while, you are here in this world, just realize that (not just thinking). While sleeping, you were there, but your body was not. Another example would be in a pitch dark place you can't see your own body, but still you feel your presence. All that I would say is expand your thinking beyond your body. Many of your doubts will vanish.

I 100% agree with you that JV is not a realized master. All his teachings are based on what is written in Hindu scriptures. It's just descriptive knowledge. People who are not aware of all those things are awed by his so-called discourses, which are just Copy/Paste content from ancient hindu scriptures. Many of his conclusive statements (Sayings?) can be very easily refuted.

novice - member
17 posts

I guess the last line should be ...

Y will always win the argument, will win the most toys and achieve the highest bliss. Everyone else is X, Z, or Q. Isn't it?


Page 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7
< older posts 21–40 of 124 newer >

This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts

It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member

join now